Re: [PATCH 02/18] dmaengine: imx-sdma: pass struct device to DMA API functions

From: Vinod Koul
Date: Sat Feb 02 2019 - 05:12:59 EST

Next message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_owner) within wake_futex_pi() triggerede"
Previous message: Andrei Vagin: "Re: [PATCH] ptrace: take into account saved_sigmask in PTRACE_{GET,SET}SIGMASK"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "[PATCH 02/18] dmaengine: imx-sdma: pass struct device to DMA API functions"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 02/18] dmaengine: imx-sdma: pass struct device to DMA API functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 01-02-19, 09:47, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The DMA API generally relies on a struct device to work properly, and
> only barely works without one for legacy reasons. Pass the easily
> available struct device from the platform_device to remedy this.

This looks good to me but fails to apply. Can you please base it on
dmaengine-next or linux-next please and resend

Thanks
--
~Vinod

Next message: Thomas Gleixner: "Re: WARN_ON_ONCE(!new_owner) within wake_futex_pi() triggerede"
Previous message: Andrei Vagin: "Re: [PATCH] ptrace: take into account saved_sigmask in PTRACE_{GET,SET}SIGMASK"
In reply to: Christoph Hellwig: "[PATCH 02/18] dmaengine: imx-sdma: pass struct device to DMA API functions"
Next in thread: Christoph Hellwig: "Re: [PATCH 02/18] dmaengine: imx-sdma: pass struct device to DMA API functions"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]