Re: [PATCH net-next v5 12/12] sock: Add SO_RCVTIMEO_NEW and SO_SNDTIMEO_NEW

[Oliver Hartkopp]

Hi all,

On 02.02.19 16:34, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> Add new socket timeout options that are y2038 safe.
(..)
> diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> index 9826d1db71d0..0d0fddb7e738 100644
> --- a/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> +++ b/arch/alpha/include/uapi/asm/socket.h
> @@ -119,19 +119,25 @@
>   #define SO_TIMESTAMPNS_NEW      64
>   #define SO_TIMESTAMPING_NEW     65
>   
> -#if !defined(__KERNEL__)
> +#define SO_RCVTIMEO_NEW         66
> +#define SO_SNDTIMEO_NEW         67
>   
> -#define	SO_RCVTIMEO SO_RCVTIMEO_OLD
> -#define	SO_SNDTIMEO SO_SNDTIMEO_OLD
> +#if !defined(__KERNEL__)
>   
>   #if __BITS_PER_LONG == 64
>   #define SO_TIMESTAMP		SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD
>   #define SO_TIMESTAMPNS		SO_TIMESTAMPNS_OLD
>   #define SO_TIMESTAMPING         SO_TIMESTAMPING_OLD
> +
> +#define SO_RCVTIMEO		SO_RCVTIMEO_OLD
> +#define SO_SNDTIMEO		SO_SNDTIMEO_OLD

Maybe I'm a bit late in this discussion as you are already in v5 ...

I can see patches making the transition in different steps where it 
might be helpful to name them *_OLD and *_NEW to understand the patches.

But in the end the naming stays in the kernel for a very long time and I 
remember myself (in early years) to name things 'new', 'new2', 'new3'.

In fact SO_TIMESTAMP_OLD should be named SO_TIMESTAMP32 and 
SO_TIMESTAMP_NEW should be named SO_TIMESTAMP64.

Especially as it tells you what is 'inside', the naming of these new 
introduced constants should be replaced with *32 and *64 names.

The documentation and the other comments still fit perfectly then.

Regards,
Oliver