Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: x86: fix use of L1 MMIO areas in nested guests

[Jim Mattson]

On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 9:37 AM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There is currently some confusion between nested and L1 GPAs.  The
> assignment to "direct" in kvm_mmu_page_fault tries to fix that, but
> it is not enough.  What this patch does is fence off the MMIO cache
> completely when using shadow nested page tables, since we have neither
> a GVA nor an L1 GPA to put in the cache.  This also allows some
> simplifications in kvm_mmu_page_fault and FNAME(page_fault).
>
> The EPT misconfig likewise does not have an L1 GPA to pass to
> kvm_io_bus_write, so that must be skipped for guest mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>         v1->v2: standardize on "nGPA" moniker, replace nested ifs with &&
>
>  arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c         | 10 +++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h |  3 +--
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c         |  7 ++++++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.h         |  6 +++++-
>  4 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> index a2c592b14617..02f8c507b160 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -3596,6 +3596,14 @@ static bool is_shadow_zero_bits_set(struct kvm_mmu *mmu, u64 spte, int level)
>
>  static bool mmio_info_in_cache(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 addr, bool direct)
>  {
> +       /*
> +        * A nested guest cannot use the MMIO cache if it is using nested
> +        * page tables, because cr2 is a nGPA while the cache stores L1's
> +        * physical addresses.
> +        */
> +       if (mmu_is_nested(vcpu))
> +               return false;
> +
>         if (direct)
>                 return vcpu_match_mmio_gpa(vcpu, addr);
>
> @@ -4841,7 +4849,7 @@ int kvm_mmu_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t cr2, u64 error_code,
>  {
>         int r, emulation_type = EMULTYPE_RETRY;
>         enum emulation_result er;
> -       bool direct = vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map || mmu_is_nested(vcpu);
> +       bool direct = vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map;
>
>         /* With shadow page tables, fault_address contains a GVA or nGPA.  */
>         if (vcpu->arch.mmu.direct_map) {
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> index 3bb90ceeb52d..86b68dc5a649 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> @@ -790,8 +790,7 @@ static int FNAME(page_fault)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t addr, u32 error_code,
>                          &map_writable))
>                 return 0;
>
> -       if (handle_abnormal_pfn(vcpu, mmu_is_nested(vcpu) ? 0 : addr,
> -                               walker.gfn, pfn, walker.pte_access, &r))
> +       if (handle_abnormal_pfn(vcpu, addr, walker.gfn, pfn, walker.pte_access, &r))
>                 return r;
>
>         /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index e2c8b33c35d1..61389ad784e4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -6402,8 +6402,13 @@ static int handle_ept_misconfig(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>         int ret;
>         gpa_t gpa;
>
> +       /*
> +        * A nested guest cannot optimize MMIO vmexits, because we have an
> +        * nGPA here instead of the required GPA.
> +        */
>         gpa = vmcs_read64(GUEST_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS);
> -       if (!kvm_io_bus_write(vcpu, KVM_FAST_MMIO_BUS, gpa, 0, NULL)) {
> +       if (!is_guest_mode(vcpu) &&
> +           !kvm_io_bus_write(vcpu, KVM_FAST_MMIO_BUS, gpa, 0, NULL)) {
>                 trace_kvm_fast_mmio(gpa);
>                 return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
>         }
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> index 612067074905..113460370a7f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.h
> @@ -90,7 +90,11 @@ static inline u32 bit(int bitno)
>  static inline void vcpu_cache_mmio_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>                                         gva_t gva, gfn_t gfn, unsigned access)
>  {
> -       vcpu->arch.mmio_gva = gva & PAGE_MASK;
> +       /*
> +        * If this is a shadow nested page table, the "GVA" is
> +        * actually a nGPA.
> +        */
> +       vcpu->arch.mmio_gva = mmu_is_nested(vcpu) ? 0 : gva & PAGE_MASK;
>         vcpu->arch.access = access;
>         vcpu->arch.mmio_gfn = gfn;
>         vcpu->arch.mmio_gen = kvm_memslots(vcpu->kvm)->generation;
> --
> 1.8.3.1

Should this patch be considered for the stable branches?