Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: imx8mq: Add the opp table and cores opp properties

From: Abel Vesa
Date: Thu Feb 28 2019 - 09:28:26 EST


On 19-02-28 22:20:32, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 06:07:24PM +0000, Abel Vesa wrote:
> > Add the 0.8GHz and 1GHz opps. According to the datasheet:
> > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nxp.com%2Fdocs%2Fen%2Fdata-sheet%2FIMX8MDQLQIEC.pdf&data=02%7C01%7Cabel.vesa%40nxp.com%7C05d898b625824204bb3908d69d880aaf%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C636869604952370425&sdata=yDuM%2ByO%2F9twQ3cXTR%2FkCSSfxOMm015qG%2FfBSFZC91SQ%3D&reserved=0
> > section 3.1.3 Operating ranges.
> >
> > The 0.8GHz opp runs in nominal mode with the regulator set to 0.9V.
> > The 1GHz runs in overdrive mode with the regulator set to 1V.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi
> > index 1a89062..ebdec9e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq.dtsi
> > @@ -91,6 +91,7 @@
> > clocks = <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_ARM>;
> > enable-method = "psci";
> > next-level-cache = <&A53_L2>;
> > + operating-points-v2 = <&a53_0_opp_table>;
> > };
> >
> > A53_1: cpu@1 {
> > @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@
> > clocks = <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_ARM>;
> > enable-method = "psci";
> > next-level-cache = <&A53_L2>;
> > + operating-points-v2 = <&a53_0_opp_table>;
> > };
> >
> > A53_2: cpu@2 {
> > @@ -111,6 +113,7 @@
> > clocks = <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_ARM>;
> > enable-method = "psci";
> > next-level-cache = <&A53_L2>;
> > + operating-points-v2 = <&a53_0_opp_table>;
> > };
> >
> > A53_3: cpu@3 {
> > @@ -121,6 +124,7 @@
> > clocks = <&clk IMX8MQ_CLK_ARM>;
> > enable-method = "psci";
> > next-level-cache = <&A53_L2>;
> > + operating-points-v2 = <&a53_0_opp_table>;
> > };
> >
> > A53_L2: l2-cache0 {
> > @@ -666,6 +670,25 @@
> > status = "disabled";
> > };
> >
> > +
> > + a53_0_opp_table: opp-table {
>
> What's the point of having '0' in the label name, considering it's
> actually referred by all CPU nodes?
>

Good catch. Will remove and resend.

Thanks.

> Shawn
>
> > + compatible = "operating-points-v2";
> > + opp-shared;
> > +
> > + opp-800000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <800000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <900000>;
> > + clock-latency-ns = <150000>;
> > + };
> > +
> > + opp-1000000000 {
> > + opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <1000000000>;
> > + opp-microvolt = <1000000>;
> > + clock-latency-ns = <150000>;
> > + opp-suspend;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > gic: interrupt-controller@38800000 {
> > compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> > reg = <0x38800000 0x10000>, /* GIC Dist */
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.infradead.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flinux-arm-kernel&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cabel.vesa%40nxp.com%7C05d898b625824204bb3908d69d880aaf%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C1%7C636869604952370425&amp;sdata=HD1WvWQJGR319rM5OrQRXRLU2zEuHzEeLMkq3vbi3OA%3D&amp;reserved=0