Re: [RFC PATCH v2 6/7] i2c: tegra-bpmp: convert to use new atomic callbacks

From: Timo Alho
Date: Mon Mar 04 2019 - 07:25:42 EST




On 2.3.2019 15.47, Wolfram Sang wrote:
The driver did handle this internally, convert it to use the new
callbacks.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra-bpmp.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra-bpmp.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra-bpmp.c
index f6cd35d0a2ac..02b78ba5b23b 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra-bpmp.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra-bpmp.c
@@ -207,7 +207,8 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_i2c_msg_len_check(struct i2c_msg *msgs, unsigned int num)
static int tegra_bpmp_i2c_msg_xfer(struct tegra_bpmp_i2c *i2c,
struct mrq_i2c_request *request,
- struct mrq_i2c_response *response)
+ struct mrq_i2c_response *response,
+ bool atomic)
{
struct tegra_bpmp_message msg;
int err;
@@ -222,7 +223,7 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_i2c_msg_xfer(struct tegra_bpmp_i2c *i2c,
msg.rx.data = response;
msg.rx.size = sizeof(*response);
- if (irqs_disabled())
+ if (atomic)
err = tegra_bpmp_transfer_atomic(i2c->bpmp, &msg);
else
err = tegra_bpmp_transfer(i2c->bpmp, &msg);
@@ -230,8 +231,9 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_i2c_msg_xfer(struct tegra_bpmp_i2c *i2c,
return err;
}
-static int tegra_bpmp_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
- struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
+static int tegra_bpmp_i2c_xfer_common(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
+ struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num,
+ bool atomic)
{
struct tegra_bpmp_i2c *i2c = i2c_get_adapdata(adapter);
struct mrq_i2c_response response;
@@ -253,7 +255,7 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
return err;
}
- err = tegra_bpmp_i2c_msg_xfer(i2c, &request, &response);
+ err = tegra_bpmp_i2c_msg_xfer(i2c, &request, &response, atomic);
if (err < 0) {
dev_err(i2c->dev, "failed to transfer message: %d\n", err);
return err;
@@ -268,6 +270,20 @@ static int tegra_bpmp_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
return num;
}
+static int tegra_bpmp_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
+ struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
+
+{
+ return tegra_bpmp_i2c_xfer_common(adapter, msgs, num, false);
+}
+
+static int tegra_bpmp_i2c_xfer_atomic(struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
+ struct i2c_msg *msgs, int num)
+
+{
+ return tegra_bpmp_i2c_xfer_common(adapter, msgs, num, true);
+}
+
static u32 tegra_bpmp_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
{
return I2C_FUNC_I2C | I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_EMUL | I2C_FUNC_10BIT_ADDR |
@@ -276,6 +292,7 @@ static u32 tegra_bpmp_i2c_func(struct i2c_adapter *adapter)
static const struct i2c_algorithm tegra_bpmp_i2c_algo = {
.master_xfer = tegra_bpmp_i2c_xfer,
+ .master_xfer_atomic = tegra_bpmp_i2c_xfer_atomic,
.functionality = tegra_bpmp_i2c_func,
};


Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Timo Alho <talho@xxxxxxxxxx>