Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] Provide in-kernel headers for making it easy to extend the kernel
From: Karim Yaghmour
Date: Tue Mar 12 2019 - 11:15:32 EST
On 3/11/19 4:03 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
[ snip ]
Now about the actual solution: what is your opinion on embedding e.g.
a squashfs image in the kernel instead, which would be a more generic
solution, not adding more ABI to /proc?
I'm not familiar enough with the intricacies of squashfs to have an
educated opinion, but I hear that it's got its quirks (need for
user-space tools, etc.) and possibly security issues. Also, I wonder
whether it's a generalized solution that still kicks the ABI can down
the road -- ultimately the kernel would still have a path/format/foo for
making kheaders available in that squashfs image and that convention
would become ABI. The only "benefit" being that said ABI wouldn't appear
under /proc, and, tbh, I'm not sure that that's actually a benefit or is
even idiomatic since kconfig.gz is already under /proc. To an extent,
the precedent set by kconfig favors kheaders to also be available in the
same location using a similar mechanism ... i.e. bonus points for
But that's my hand-wavy gut-reaction response to your question. I'm sure
others on this thread have far more informed opinions about the
specifics than I could have. My priority was to clarify the basis for
the need being addressed.
CEO - Opersys inc. / www.opersys.com