Re: [PATCH v6 1/7] psi: introduce state_mask to represent stalled psi states

[Suren Baghdasaryan]

On Tue, Mar 19, 2019 at 5:02 PM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Suren,

Hi Stephen,

> On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:56:13 -0700 Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > The psi monitoring patches will need to determine the same states as
> > record_times().  To avoid calculating them twice, maintain a state mask
> > that can be consulted cheaply.  Do this in a separate patch to keep the
> > churn in the main feature patch at a minimum.
> >
> > This adds 4-byte state_mask member into psi_group_cpu struct which results
> > in its first cacheline-aligned part becoming 52 bytes long.  Add explicit
> > values to enumeration element counters that affect psi_group_cpu struct
> > size.
> >
> > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190124211518.244221-4-surenb@xxxxxxxxxx
> > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Dennis Zhou <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This last SOB line should not be here ... it is only there on the
> original patch because I import Andrew's quilt series into linux-next.

Sorry about that. This particular patch has not changed since then,
that's why I kept all the lines there. Please let me know if I should
remove it and re-post the patchset.
Thanks,
Suren.

> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kernel-team" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to kernel-team+unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxx