Re: -Wsometimes-uninitialized Clang warning in drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c

From: Nathan Chancellor
Date: Wed Mar 20 2019 - 15:09:01 EST


On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:57:35PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We are trying to get Clang's -Wsometimes-uninitialized turned on for the
> kernel as it can catch some bugs that GCC can't. This warning came up:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:1612:6: warning: variable 'len' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
> if (rxcmp1->rx_cmp_cfa_code_errors_v2 & RX_CMP_L2_ERRORS) {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:1703:19: note: uninitialized use occurs here
> cpr->rx_bytes += len;
> ^~~
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:1612:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always false
> if (rxcmp1->rx_cmp_cfa_code_errors_v2 & RX_CMP_L2_ERRORS) {
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c:1540:18: note: initialize the variable 'len' to silence this warning
> unsigned int len;
> ^
> = 0
> 1 warning generated.
>
> It seems like the logical change to make is this; however, I am not sure
> if this has any other unintended consequences since this is a rather
> dense function. I would much appreciate your input, especially if there
> is a better way to fix it.
>
> Cheers,
> Nathan
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> index 0bb9d7b3a2b6..7d3d206c2e86 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
> @@ -1615,7 +1615,7 @@ static int bnxt_rx_pkt(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_cp_ring_info *cpr,
> bnxt_reuse_rx_agg_bufs(cpr, cp_cons, agg_bufs);
>
> rc = -EIO;
> - goto next_rx;
> + goto next_rx_no_prod_no_len;
> }
>
> len = le32_to_cpu(rxcmp->rx_cmp_len_flags_type) >> RX_CMP_LEN_SHIFT;

Gentle ping (if there was a response to this, I didn't receive it). I
know I sent it in the middle of a merge window so I get if it slipped
through the cracks.

Thanks,
Nathan