Re: [PATCH v3] kmemleaak: survive in a low-memory situation

From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Tue Mar 26 2019 - 12:05:46 EST

On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 11:43:38AM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> Unless there is a brave soul to reimplement the kmemleak to embed it's
> metadata into the tracked memory itself in a foreseeable future, this
> provides a good balance between enabling kmemleak in a low-memory
> situation and not introducing too much hackiness into the existing
> code for now.

I don't understand kmemleak. Kirill pointed me at this a few days ago:

It's caused by the XArray allocating memory using GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN.
kmemleak then decides it needs to allocate memory to track this memory.
So it calls kmem_cache_alloc(object_cache, gfp_kmemleak_mask(gfp));

#define gfp_kmemleak_mask(gfp) (((gfp) & (GFP_KERNEL | GFP_ATOMIC)) | \

then the page allocator gets to see GFP_NOFAIL | GFP_NOWAIT and gets angry.

But I don't understand why kmemleak needs to mess with the GFP flags at
all. Just allocate using the same flags as the caller, and fail the original
allocation if the kmemleak allocation fails. Like this:

+++ b/mm/slab.h
@@ -435,12 +435,22 @@ static inline void slab_post_alloc_hook(struct kmem_cache *s, gfp_t flags,
for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
p[i] = kasan_slab_alloc(s, p[i], flags);
/* As p[i] might get tagged, call kmemleak hook after KASAN. */
- kmemleak_alloc_recursive(p[i], s->object_size, 1,
- s->flags, flags);
+ if (kmemleak_alloc_recursive(p[i], s->object_size, 1,
+ s->flags, flags))
+ goto fail;

if (memcg_kmem_enabled())
+ return;
+ while (i > 0) {
+ kasan_blah(...);
+ kmemleak_blah();
+ i--;
+ }
+ free_blah(p);
+ *p = NULL;


and if we had something like this, we wouldn't need kmemleak to have this
self-disabling or must-succeed property.