Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Add new compatible for static replicator

From: Suzuki K Poulose
Date: Mon Apr 08 2019 - 06:42:45 EST


On 04/06/2019 12:21 PM, Leo Yan wrote:
CoreSight uses below bindings for replicator:

Static replicator, aka. non-configurable replicator:
"arm,coresight-replicator";

Dynamic replicator, aka. configurable replicator:
"arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell";

The compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is not an explicit
naming to express the replicator is 'static'. To unify the naming
convention, this patch introduces a new compatible string
"arm,coresight-static-replicator" for the static replicator; the
compatible string "arm,coresight-replicator" is still kept thus we
can support the old DT binding, but tag it as obsolete and suggest
to use the new compatible string.

As result CoreSight replicator have below bindings:

Static replicator:
"arm,coresight-replicator"; (obsolete)
"arm,coresight-static-replicator";

Dynamic replicator:
"arm,coresight-dynamic-replicator", "arm,primecell";

Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
index f8aff65ab921..f8f794869af2 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/coresight.txt
@@ -69,7 +69,11 @@ its hardware characteristcs.
* compatible: Currently supported value is (note the absence of the
AMBA markee):
- - "arm,coresight-replicator"
+ - Coresight Non-configurable Replicator, the compatible string
+ "arm,coresight-replicator" is obsolete, keep it to support

To make it more obvious : s/obsolete/OBSOLETE/

+ the old DT bindings:
+ "arm,coresight-replicator";
+ "arm,coresight-static-replicator";

nit: I would re-order the compatible strings to show the precedence of
choice.

e.g,
- CoreSight non-configurable Replicator
"arm,coresight-static-replicator";
"arm,coresight-replicator"; (OBSOLETE. For
backward compatibility. Will be removed )


Also, please could we put a warning in the driver when we encounter it
and request to update it ?

Cheers
Suzuki