On 09/04/2019 11:33, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:Ok, sounds good
On 4/9/19 12:28 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:Sorry for not having done the review properly in the past. ;-)
On 09/04/2019 11:15, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:Hm, I am doing this as I did for the rest of protocols before:
From: Oleksandr Andrushchenko <oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>I'm in principle fine with this patch, but it should be sent as part of
This is the ABI for the two halves of a para-virtualized
camera driver which extends Xen's reach multimedia capabilities even
further enabling it for video conferencing, In-Vehicle Infotainment,
high definition maps etc.
The initial goal is to support most needed functionality with the
final idea to make it possible to extend the protocol if need be:
1. Provide means for base virtual device configuration:
 - pixel formats
 - resolutions
 - frame rates
2. Support basic camera controls:
 - contrast
 - brightness
 - hue
 - saturation
3. Support streaming control
Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Andrushchenko
<oleksandr_andrushchenko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
a series using that header. In case the related driver isn't accepted
we'd end up with a stale header file.
1. Get the protocol in Xen
2. Get the copy in Linux
3. Upstream driver (use header)
Even if the driver is not accepted (hope this won't happen)Having an unused header file is not good.
then this patch makes Xen and Linux properly aligned anyway.
Which is IMO good
Be assured I'm going to give you the needed Reviewed-by: tag for
the patch adding the header in a series using it.
Juergen