Re: [PATCH v5 2/5] virtio-pmem: Add virtio pmem driver

[Cornelia Huck]

On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:38:22 +0530
Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> This patch adds virtio-pmem driver for KVM guest.
> 
> Guest reads the persistent memory range information from
> Qemu over VIRTIO and registers it on nvdimm_bus. It also
> creates a nd_region object with the persistent memory
> range information so that existing 'nvdimm/pmem' driver
> can reserve this into system memory map. This way
> 'virtio-pmem' driver uses existing functionality of pmem
> driver to register persistent memory compatible for DAX
> capable filesystems.
> 
> This also provides function to perform guest flush over
> VIRTIO from 'pmem' driver when userspace performs flush
> on DAX memory range.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <pagupta@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c     |  88 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/virtio/Kconfig           |  10 +++
>  drivers/virtio/Makefile          |   1 +
>  drivers/virtio/pmem.c            | 124 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/virtio_pmem.h      |  60 +++++++++++++++
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h  |   1 +
>  include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h |  10 +++
>  7 files changed, 294 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/nvdimm/virtio_pmem.c
>  create mode 100644 drivers/virtio/pmem.c
>  create mode 100644 include/linux/virtio_pmem.h
>  create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> 
(...)
> diff --git a/drivers/virtio/pmem.c b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..cc9de9589d56
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/virtio/pmem.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,124 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * virtio_pmem.c: Virtio pmem Driver
> + *
> + * Discovers persistent memory range information
> + * from host and registers the virtual pmem device
> + * with libnvdimm core.
> + */
> +#include <linux/virtio_pmem.h>
> +#include <../../drivers/nvdimm/nd.h>
> +
> +static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> +	{ VIRTIO_ID_PMEM, VIRTIO_DEV_ANY_ID },
> +	{ 0 },
> +};
> +
> + /* Initialize virt queue */
> +static int init_vq(struct virtio_pmem *vpmem)

IMHO, you don't gain much by splitting off this function...

> +{
> +	struct virtqueue *vq;
> +
> +	/* single vq */
> +	vpmem->req_vq = vq = virtio_find_single_vq(vpmem->vdev,
> +				host_ack, "flush_queue");
> +	if (IS_ERR(vq))
> +		return PTR_ERR(vq);

I'm personally not a fan of chained assignments... I think I'd just
drop the 'vq' variable and operate on vpmem->req_vq directly.

> +
> +	spin_lock_init(&vpmem->pmem_lock);
> +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vpmem->req_list);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +};
> +
> +static int virtio_pmem_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	int err = 0;
> +	struct resource res;
> +	struct virtio_pmem *vpmem;
> +	struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus;
> +	struct nd_region_desc ndr_desc = {};
> +	int nid = dev_to_node(&vdev->dev);
> +	struct nd_region *nd_region;
> +
> +	if (!vdev->config->get) {
> +		dev_err(&vdev->dev, "%s failure: config disabled\n",

Maybe s/config disabled/config access disabled/ ? That seems to be the
more common message.

> +			__func__);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +
> +	vdev->priv = vpmem = devm_kzalloc(&vdev->dev, sizeof(*vpmem),
> +					GFP_KERNEL);

Here, the vpmem variable makes sense for convenience, but I'm again not
a fan of the chaining :)

> +	if (!vpmem) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
> +		goto out_err;
> +	}
> +
> +	vpmem->vdev = vdev;
> +	err = init_vq(vpmem);
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out_err;
> +
> +	virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config,
> +			start, &vpmem->start);
> +	virtio_cread(vpmem->vdev, struct virtio_pmem_config,
> +			size, &vpmem->size);
> +
> +	res.start = vpmem->start;
> +	res.end   = vpmem->start + vpmem->size-1;
> +	vpmem->nd_desc.provider_name = "virtio-pmem";
> +	vpmem->nd_desc.module = THIS_MODULE;
> +
> +	vpmem->nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus = nvdimm_bus_register(&vdev->dev,
> +						&vpmem->nd_desc);

And here :)

> +	if (!nvdimm_bus)
> +		goto out_vq;
> +
> +	dev_set_drvdata(&vdev->dev, nvdimm_bus);
> +
> +	ndr_desc.res = &res;
> +	ndr_desc.numa_node = nid;
> +	ndr_desc.flush = virtio_pmem_flush;
> +	set_bit(ND_REGION_PAGEMAP, &ndr_desc.flags);
> +	set_bit(ND_REGION_ASYNC, &ndr_desc.flags);
> +	nd_region = nvdimm_pmem_region_create(nvdimm_bus, &ndr_desc);
> +	nd_region->provider_data =  dev_to_virtio
> +					(nd_region->dev.parent->parent);

Isn't it clear that this parent chain will always end up at &vdev->dev?
Maybe simply set ->provider_data to vdev directly? (Does it need to
grab a reference count of the device, BTW?)

> +
> +	if (!nd_region)
> +		goto out_nd;

Probably better to do this check before you access nd_region's
members :)

> +
> +	return 0;
> +out_nd:
> +	err = -ENXIO;
> +	nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus);
> +out_vq:
> +	vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> +out_err:
> +	dev_err(&vdev->dev, "failed to register virtio pmem memory\n");
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void virtio_pmem_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_pmem *vpmem = vdev->priv;
> +	struct nvdimm_bus *nvdimm_bus = dev_get_drvdata(&vdev->dev);
> +
> +	nvdimm_bus_unregister(nvdimm_bus);

I haven't followed this around the nvdimm code, but is the nd_region
you created during probe cleaned up automatically, or would you need to
do something here?

> +	vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> +	vdev->config->reset(vdev);
> +	kfree(vpmem);

You allocated vpmem via devm_kzalloc; isn't it freed automatically on
remove?

> +}
> +
> +static struct virtio_driver virtio_pmem_driver = {
> +	.driver.name		= KBUILD_MODNAME,
> +	.driver.owner		= THIS_MODULE,
> +	.id_table		= id_table,
> +	.probe			= virtio_pmem_probe,
> +	.remove			= virtio_pmem_remove,
> +};
> +
> +module_virtio_driver(virtio_pmem_driver);
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(virtio, id_table);
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Virtio pmem driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");

Only looked at this from the general virtio driver angle; seems fine
apart from some easy-to-fix issues and some personal style preference
things.