Re: [PATCH 5/5] leds: lm3697: Introduce the lm3697 driver

From: Dan Murphy
Date: Mon Apr 15 2019 - 15:53:46 EST




On 4/15/19 9:03 AM, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>> index 735009e73414..688bb9a6f275 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>> @@ -776,9 +776,15 @@ config LEDS_NIC78BX
>>>> To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the module
>>>> will be called leds-nic78bx.
>>>>
>>>> +config LEDS_LM3697
>>>> + tristate "LED driver for LM3697"
>>>> + depends on LEDS_TI_LMU_COMMON
>>>> + help
>>>> + Say Y to enable the LM3697 LED driver for TI LMU devices.
>>>> + This supports the LED device LM3697.
>>>> +
>>>> config LEDS_TI_LMU_COMMON
>>>> tristate "LED driver for TI LMU"
>>>> - depends on REGMAP
>>>> help
>>>> Say Y to enable the LED driver for TI LMU devices.
>>>> This supports common features between the TI LM3532, LM3631, LM3632,
> ...
>>> Plus we'd normally expect "COMMON" first and then specific driver. Not
>>> sure if Kconfig can handle it out-of-order...
>>
>> OK. Should I rename the ti_lmu file to leds-common-ti-lmu?
>
> Oh, no, that is not what I meant.
>
> You have
>
> config B
> depends on A
>
> config A
>
> above. We really want
>
> config A
>
> config B
> depends on A
>

Got it I will rearrange that in v2.

>> This keeps the naming convention the same in the leds directory as well.
>>
>> FYI I will not add your acked-by on the LMU patch that introduced the code unless you approve.
>> Since you found issues with the kconfig
>
> I did not review it in great detail, so no acked-by's, yet :-).

Thanks
Dan

> Pavel
>