Re: [PATCH] kdb: Get rid of broken attempt to print CCVERSION in kdb summary
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Thu Apr 18 2019 - 19:06:56 EST
On Wed, 17 Apr 2019 15:37:49 +0900 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It's pretty benign: Doug will still only get a single email.
> > checkpatch checks for duplicates cc's but I think it assumes that
> > things like
> > Reported-by: fred
> > Tested-by: fred
> > were intentional.
> > It would perhaps be better for checkpatch to special-case the "Cc:
> > fred" tag and report a duplicated Cc: if fred was also mentioned in any
> > other tag.
> Sorry, I do not understand what you mean.
> Douglas did not add any Cc: tag at all
> in his original patch:
> It's you who added the Cc: tags
> (and I am guessing you did it by scripting.)
> Why is this topic related to checkpatch?
Because I regularly check all patches with checkpatch but checkpatch
failed to detect that I had
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
and I believe that checkpatch could and should have warned about this