Re: [PATCH v20 00/28] Intel SGX1 support

From: Dave Hansen
Date: Fri Apr 19 2019 - 15:02:46 EST

Next message: Paul Moore: "Re: kernel BUG at kernel/cred.c:434!"
Previous message: Raj, Ashok: "Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] PCI/IOV: Add support to verify PF/VF spec compliance"
In reply to: Jethro Beekman: "Re: [PATCH v20 00/28] Intel SGX1 support"
Next in thread: Cedric Xing: "[RFC PATCH v1 0/3] An alternative __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() to allow enclave/host parameter passing using untrusted stack"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 4/19/19 7:17 AM, Dr. Greg wrote:
> 3.) The approach we propose addresses these issues while imposing no
> functional limitations on how Linux platform owners can use enclave
> technology.

Let's say v20 gets merged. Is there any reason your approach can not be
rebased on top of that code, reviewed and merged later?

Next message: Paul Moore: "Re: kernel BUG at kernel/cred.c:434!"
Previous message: Raj, Ashok: "Re: [PATCH v1 1/5] PCI/IOV: Add support to verify PF/VF spec compliance"
In reply to: Jethro Beekman: "Re: [PATCH v20 00/28] Intel SGX1 support"
Next in thread: Cedric Xing: "[RFC PATCH v1 0/3] An alternative __vdso_sgx_enter_enclave() to allow enclave/host parameter passing using untrusted stack"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]