Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] clk: Allow parents to be specified without string names
From: Stephen Boyd
Date: Fri Apr 19 2019 - 18:13:01 EST
Quoting Stephen Boyd (2019-04-12 11:31:47)
> The common clk framework is lacking in ability to describe the clk
> topology without specifying strings for every possible parent-child
> link. There are a few drawbacks to the current approach:
> 1) String comparisons are used for everything, including describing
> topologies that are 'local' to a single clock controller.
> 2) clk providers (e.g. i2c clk drivers) need to create globally unique
> clk names to avoid collisions in the clk namespace, leading to awkward
> name generation code in various clk drivers.
> 3) DT bindings may not fully describe the clk topology and linkages
> between clk controllers because drivers can easily rely on globally unique
> strings to describe connections between clks.
> This leads to confusing DT bindings, complicated clk name generation
> code, and inefficient string comparisons during clk registration just so
> that the clk framework can detect the topology of the clk tree.
> Furthermore, some drivers call clk_get() and then __clk_get_name() to
> extract the globally unique clk name just so they can specify the parent
> of the clk they're registering. We have of_clk_parent_fill() but that
> mostly only works for single clks registered from a DT node, which isn't
> the norm. Let's simplify this all by introducing two new ways of
> specifying clk parents.
> The first method is an array of pointers to clk_hw structures
> corresponding to the parents at that index. This works for clks that are
> registered when we have access to all the clk_hw pointers for the
> The second method is a mix of clk_hw pointers and strings of local and
> global parent clk names. If the .fw_name member of the map is set we'll
> look for that clk by performing a DT based lookup of the device the clk
> is registered with and the .name specified in the map. If that fails,
> we'll fallback to the .name member and perform a global clk name lookup
> like we've always done before.
> Using either one of these new methods is entirely optional. Existing
> drivers will continue to work, and they can migrate to this new approach
> as they see fit. Eventually, we'll want to get rid of the 'parent_names'
> array in struct clk_init_data and use one of these new methods instead.
> Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jeffrey Hugo <jhugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx>
Applied to clk-next