Re: [PATCH v3] signal: trace_signal_deliver when signal_group_exit

[weizhenliang]

On 04/23, Greg KH wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 10:59:50PM +0800, Zhenliang Wei wrote:
>> In the fixes commit, removing SIGKILL from each thread signal mask and 
>> executing "goto fatal" directly will skip the call to 
>> "trace_signal_deliver". At this point, the delivery tracking of the 
>> SIGKILL signal will be inaccurate.
>> 
>> Therefore, we need to add trace_signal_deliver before "goto fatal"
>> after executing sigdelset.
>> 
>> Note: The action[SIGKILL] must be SIG_DFL, and SEND_SIG_NOINFO matches 
>> the fact that SIGKILL doesn't have any info.
>> 
>> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Fixes: cf43a757fd4944 ("signal: Restore the stop PTRACE_EVENT_EXIT")
>> Signed-off-by: Zhenliang Wei <weizhenliang@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  kernel/signal.c | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c index 
>> 227ba170298e..0f69ada376ef 100644
>> --- a/kernel/signal.c
>> +++ b/kernel/signal.c
>> @@ -2441,6 +2441,7 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
>>  	if (signal_group_exit(signal)) {
>>  		ksig->info.si_signo = signr = SIGKILL;
>>  		sigdelset(&current->pending.signal, SIGKILL);
>> +		trace_signal_deliver(SIGKILL, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, SIG_DFL);
>>  		recalc_sigpending();
>>  		goto fatal;
>>  	}
>> --
>> 2.14.1.windows.1
>> 
>> 
>
><formletter>
>
>This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree.  Please read:
>    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
>for how to do this properly.
>
></formletter>

Thans for your reply, is that mean I still need to add tags
	Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
if I want to submit this patch to the stable kernel tree?

Is my understanding correct or missing?

Wei