Re: [PATCH v7 00/10] vsprintf: Prevent silent crashes and consolidate error handling
From: Petr Mladek
Date: Wed Apr 24 2019 - 09:53:11 EST
On Fri 2019-04-19 10:51:12, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (04/17/19 13:53), Petr Mladek wrote:
> > Crash in vsprintf() might be silent when it happens under logbuf_lock
> > in vprintk_emit(). This patch set prevents most of the crashes by probing
> > the address. The check is done only by %s and some %p* specifiers that need
> > to dereference the address.
> > Only the first byte of the address is checked to keep it simple. It should
> > be enough to catch most problems.
> > The check is explicitly done in each function that does the dereference.
> > It helps to avoid the questionable strchr() of affected specifiers. This
> > change motivated me to do some preparation patches that consolidated
> > the error handling and cleaned the code a bit.
> The patch set looks OK to me.
> I got confused by 'pC?' error string, but once you start looking
> at it as a regex (? - zero or one occurrences) things look OK.
> Regex in dmesg/serial output might be something very new to people,
> stack traces, after all, is a rather common error reporting mechanism.
> So the previous "WARN_ON() + exact unrecognized fmt[N] char" was not
> totally awful or wrong (well, it was, before we introduced printk_safe()),
> but I don't have strong objections against that new regex thing.
> Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@xxxxxxxxx>
Thanks a lot for review.
I have pushed the entire patchset into printk.git,
branch for-5.2-vsprintf-hardening to get some
test coverage via linux-next.
I still expect some feedback, especially from Andy
who seems to have a vacation these days.
I think that Andy wanted these changes rather sooner
than later, so I hope that he would be fine with it.
I could take it back in case of disagreement.