Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] iommu/vt-d: Expose ISA direct mapping region via iommu_get_resv_regions

From: Tom Murphy
Date: Wed Apr 24 2019 - 19:47:49 EST


I can see two potential problems with these patches that should be addressed:

The default domain of a group can be changed to type
IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY via the command line. With these patches we are
returning the si_domain for type IOMMU_DOMAIN_IDENTITY. There's a
chance the shared si_domain could be freed while it is still being
used when a group is freed. For example here in the
iommu_group_release:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/cd8dead0c39457e58ec1d36db93aedca811d48f1/drivers/iommu/iommu.c#L376
"if (group->default_domain)
iommu_domain_free(group->default_domain);"

Also now that a domain is attached to a device earlier we should
implement the is_attach_deferred call-back and use it to defer the
domain attach from iommu driver init to device driver init when iommu
is pre-enabled in kdump kernel. like in this commit:
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/df3f7a6e8e855e4ff533508807cd7c3723faa51f


On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 3:24 AM Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi James,
>
> On 4/15/19 10:16 PM, James Sewart wrote:
> > Hey Lu,
> >
> >> On 10 Apr 2019, at 06:22, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi James,
> >>
> >> On 4/6/19 2:02 AM, James Sewart wrote:
> >>> Hey Lu,
> >>> My bad, did some debugging on my end. The issue was swapping out
> >>> find_domain for iommu_get_domain_for_dev. It seems in some situations the
> >>> domain is not attached to the group but the device is expected to have the
> >>> domain still stored in its archdata.
> >>> Iâve attached the final patch with find_domain unremoved which seems to
> >>> work in my testing.
> >>
> >> Just looked into your v3 patch set and some thoughts from my end posted
> >> here just for your information.
> >>
> >> Let me post the problems we want to address.
> >>
> >> 1. When allocating a new group for a device, how should we determine the
> >> type of the default domain?
> >>
> >> 2. If we need to put a device into an existing group which uses a
> >> different type of domain from what the device desires to use, we might
> >> break the functionality of the device.
> >>
> >> My new thought is letting the iommu generic code to determine the
> >> default domain type (hence my proposed vendor specific default domain
> >> type patches could be dropped).
> >>
> >> If the default domain type is dynamical mapping, and later in iommu_no_mapping(), we determines that we must use an identity domain,
> >> we then call iommu_request_dm_for_dev(dev).
> >>
> >> If the default domain type is identity mapping, and later in
> >> iommu_no_mapping(), we determined that we must use a dynamical domain,
> >> we then call iommu_request_dma_domain_for_dev(dev).
> >>
> >> We already have iommu_request_dm_for_dev() in iommu.c. We only need to
> >> implement iommu_request_dma_domain_for_dev().
> >>
> >> With this done, your patch titled "Create an IOMMU group for devices
> >> that require an identity map" could also be dropped.
> >>
> >> Any thoughts?
> >
> > Theres a couple issues I can think of. iommu_request_dm_for_dev changes
> > the domain for all devices within the devices group, if we may have
> > devices with different domain requirements in the same group then only the
> > last initialised device will get the domain it wants. If we want to add
> > iommu_request_dma_domain_for_dev then we would still need another IOMMU
> > group for identity domain devices.
>
> Current solution (a.k.a. v3) for this is to assign a new group to the
> device which requires an identity mapped domain. This will break the
> functionality of device direct pass-through (to user level). The iommu
> group represents the minimum granularity of iommu isolation and
> protection. The requirement of identity mapped domain should not be a
> factor for a new group.
>
> Both iomm_request_dma_domain_for_dev() or iommu_request_dm_for_dev()
> only support groups with a single device in it.
>
> The users could choose between domains of DMA type or IDENTITY type for
> a group. If multiple devices share a single group and both don't work
> for them, they have to disable the IOMMU. This isn't a valid
> configuration from IOMMU's point of view.
>
> >
> > Both with v3 and the proposed method here, iommu_should_identity_map is
> > determining whether the device requires an identity map. In v3 this is
> > called once up front by the generic code to determine for the IOMMU group
> > which domain type to use. In the proposed method I think this would happen
> > after initial domain allocation and would trigger the domain to be
> > replaced with a different domain.
> >
> > I prefer the solution in v3. What do you think?
>
> The only concern of solution in v3 from my point of view is some kind of
> duplication. Even we can ask the Intel IOMMU driver to tell the default
> domain type, we might change it after boot up. For example, for 32-bit
> pci devices, we don't know whether it's 64-bit or 32-bit capable during
> IOMMU initialization, so we might tell iommu.c to use identity mapped
> domain. After boot up, we check it again, and find out that it's only
> 32-bit capable (hence only can access physical memory below 4G) and the
> default identity domain doesn't work. And we have to change it to DMA
> domain via iommu_request_dma_domain_for_dev().
>
> So to make it simple and straight-forward, we can just let iommu.c to
> determine the default domain type and after that the Intel IOMMU driver
> could tweak it according to the quirk bits in the driver.
>
> Best regards,
> Lu Baolu