Re: [PATCH 1/3] bridge: Fix error path for kobject_init_and_add()

[Tyler Hicks]

On 2019-04-30 10:28:15, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> Currently error return from kobject_init_and_add() is not followed by a
> call to kobject_put().  This means there is a memory leak.
> 
> Add call to kobject_put() in error path of kobject_init_and_add().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <tobin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  net/bridge/br_if.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_if.c b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> index 41f0a696a65f..e5c8c9941c51 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_if.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_if.c
> @@ -607,8 +607,10 @@ int br_add_if(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_device *dev,
>  
>  	err = kobject_init_and_add(&p->kobj, &brport_ktype, &(dev->dev.kobj),
>  				   SYSFS_BRIDGE_PORT_ATTR);
> -	if (err)
> +	if (err) {
> +		kobject_put(&p->kobj);
>  		goto err1;
> +	}

I think this is duplicating the code under the err2 label and doing so
in a way that would introduce a double free.

If the refcount hits 0 in the kobject_put(), release_nbp() is called
which calls kfree() on the p pointer. However, the p pointer is never
set to NULL like what's done under the err2 label. Once we're back in
br_add_if(), kfree() is called on the p pointer again just before
returning.

I think it would be better if you just jumped to the err2 label instead
of err1. err1 will no longer be used so, unfortunately, you'll have to
refactor all the labels at the same time.

Tyler

>  
>  	err = br_sysfs_addif(p);
>  	if (err)
> -- 
> 2.21.0
>