Re: [PATCH] block: Fix function name in comment

[Raul Rangel]

On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 01:33:45PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-05-02 at 13:48 -0600, Raul E Rangel wrote:
> > The comment was out of date.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> >  block/blk-mq.c | 2 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> > index 9516304a38ee..0e467ff440a2 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> > index 9516304a38ee..0e467ff440a2 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> > @@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ void blk_mq_free_rqs(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set, struct blk_mq_tags *tags,
> >                 list_del_init(&page->lru);
> >                 /*
> >                  * Remove kmemleak object previously allocated in
> > -                * blk_mq_init_rq_map().
> > +                * blk_mq_alloc_rqs().
> >                  */
> >                 kmemleak_free(page_address(page));
> >                 __free_pages(page, page->private);
> 
> Does the entire comment fit on a single 80 column line? In other words, can
> the comment that is spread over four lines be reduced to a single line?
No, it would put it at 91 characters long.

Raul
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.