Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] dt-bindings: mfd: Document Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC-IF MFD bindings

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Tue May 14 2019 - 06:09:46 EST


Hi Mason,

On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 11:46 AM <masonccyang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> There's precedence for such constructs being an MFD: please see
> > >> drivers/mfd/at91-usart.c, which registers a single MFD cell for
> > > second for the direct mapping read mode and
> > > third for the write buffer area.
> > > - reg-names: should contain "regs", "dirmap" and "wbuf"
> > > - clocks: should contain 1 entries for the module's clock
> > > - clock-names: should contain "rpc"
> >
> > I suspect we'd need the RPC/RPCD2 clocks mentioned as well (not sure
> yet)...
>
> Need it ?
> RPCD2 is derived from RPC and it's value is half of RPC,
> i.e., RPC = 160MHz, RPCD2 = 80 MHz

That hierarchy depends on the actual SoC, right?
AFAIU, both are derived from RPCSRC, and can be controlled individually
on some SoCs.

BTW, I still haven't seen a patch for drivers/clk/renesas/r8a77995-cpg-mssr.c
adding RPC-related clocks, so I have no idea what's the Linux view of the
hierarchy on your system.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds