On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 6:00 PM Oleksandr <olekstysh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 13.05.19 18:13, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:Fine for me, thanks!
Indeed, you are right.So, if the DT bindings for the counter module is not an option (if IYes, that sounds good to me.
correctly understood a discussion pointed by Geert in another letter),
we should probably prevent all timer code here from being executed if
PSCI is in use.
What I mean is to return to , but with the modification to use
psci_smp_available() helper as an indicator of PSCI usage.
Julien, Geert, what do you think?
Note that psci_smp_available() seems to return false if CONFIG_SMP=n,
so checking for that is not sufficient to avoid crashes when running a
uniprocessor kernel on a PSCI-enabled system.
Nothing than just check for psci_ops.cpu_on == NULL directly comes to
Have already checked with CONFIG_SMP=n, it works.