Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/panel: truly: Add additional delay after pulling down reset gpio

From: Marc Gonzalez
Date: Tue May 28 2019 - 04:46:40 EST


On 27/05/2019 12:26, Vivek Gautam wrote:

> MTP SDM845 panel seems to need additional delay to bring panel
> to a workable state. Running modetest without this change displays
> blurry artifacts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-truly-nt35597.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-truly-nt35597.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-truly-nt35597.c
> index fc2a66c53db4..aa7153fd3be4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-truly-nt35597.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-truly-nt35597.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,7 @@ static int truly_35597_power_on(struct truly_nt35597 *ctx)
> gpiod_set_value(ctx->reset_gpio, 1);
> usleep_range(10000, 20000);
> gpiod_set_value(ctx->reset_gpio, 0);
> + usleep_range(10000, 20000);

I'm not sure usleep_range() makes sense with these values.

AFAIU, usleep_range() is typically used for sub-jiffy sleeps, and is based
on HRT to generate an interrupt.

Once we get into jiffy granularity, it seems to me msleep() is good enough.
IIUC, it would piggy-back on the jiffy timer interrupt.

In short, why not just use msleep(10); ?

Regards.