[tip:locking/core] locking/lockdep: Adjust lock usage bit character checks

From: tip-bot for Yuyang Du
Date: Mon Jun 03 2019 - 09:11:47 EST


Commit-ID: c52478f4f38ace598475413a08dba9b9fd827eaf
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/c52478f4f38ace598475413a08dba9b9fd827eaf
Author: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@xxxxxxxxx>
AuthorDate: Mon, 6 May 2019 16:19:19 +0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
CommitDate: Mon, 3 Jun 2019 11:55:35 +0200

locking/lockdep: Adjust lock usage bit character checks

The lock usage bit characters are defined and determined with tricks.
Add some explanation to make it a bit clearer, then adjust the logic to
check the usage, which optimizes the code a bit.

No functional change.

Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: bvanassche@xxxxxxx
Cc: frederic@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: ming.lei@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: will.deacon@xxxxxxx
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190506081939.74287-4-duyuyang@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 109b56267c8f..a033df00fd1d 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -500,15 +500,26 @@ static inline unsigned long lock_flag(enum lock_usage_bit bit)

static char get_usage_char(struct lock_class *class, enum lock_usage_bit bit)
{
+ /*
+ * The usage character defaults to '.' (i.e., irqs disabled and not in
+ * irq context), which is the safest usage category.
+ */
char c = '.';

- if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit + LOCK_USAGE_DIR_MASK))
+ /*
+ * The order of the following usage checks matters, which will
+ * result in the outcome character as follows:
+ *
+ * - '+': irq is enabled and not in irq context
+ * - '-': in irq context and irq is disabled
+ * - '?': in irq context and irq is enabled
+ */
+ if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit + LOCK_USAGE_DIR_MASK)) {
c = '+';
- if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit)) {
- c = '-';
- if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit + LOCK_USAGE_DIR_MASK))
+ if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit))
c = '?';
- }
+ } else if (class->usage_mask & lock_flag(bit))
+ c = '-';

return c;
}