Re: [RFC 1/3] softirq: Use preempt_latency_stop/start to trace preemption
From: Steven Rostedt
Date: Tue Jun 04 2019 - 08:05:55 EST
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 12:39:03 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > This sounds more like a break in behavior not a functional change. I
> > guess moving it to a header and making it a static __always_inline
> > should be fine though.
> Steve, which header should I use?
I would say include/linux/preempt.h if Peter doesn't have any issues