Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] iommu: Add device fault reporting API
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker
Date: Wed Jun 05 2019 - 07:30:40 EST
On 03/06/2019 22:59, Jacob Pan wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2019 15:57:45 +0100
> Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe.brucker@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Allow device drivers and VFIO to get notified on IOMMU translation
>> fault, and handle recoverable faults (PCI PRI). Several series require
>> this API (Intel VT-d and Arm SMMUv3 nested support, as well as the
>> generic host SVA implementation).
>> Changes since v1 :
>> * Allocate iommu_param earlier, in iommu_probe_device().
>> * Pass struct iommu_fault to fault handlers, instead of the
>> iommu_fault_event wrapper.
>> * Removed unused iommu_fault_event::iommu_private.
>> * Removed unnecessary iommu_page_response::addr.
>> * Added iommu_page_response::version, which would allow to introduce a
>> new incompatible iommu_page_response structure (as opposed to just
>> adding a flag + field).
>>  [PATCH 0/4] iommu: Add device fault reporting API
>> Jacob Pan (3):
>> driver core: Add per device iommu param
>> iommu: Introduce device fault data
>> iommu: Introduce device fault report API
>> Jean-Philippe Brucker (1):
>> iommu: Add recoverable fault reporting
> This interface meet the need for vt-d, just one more comment on 2/4. Do
> you want to add Co-developed-by you for the three patches from me?
I'm fine without it, I don't think it adds much to the Signed-off-by,
which is required