Re: [PATCH 06/10] mfd / platform: cros_ec: Reorganize platform and mfd includes

From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Wed Jun 05 2019 - 10:24:06 EST

On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 05:20:15PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> There is a bit of mess between cros-ec mfd includes and platform
> includes. For example, we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h include that
> exports the interface implemented in platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c. Or
> we have a linux/mfd/cros_ec_commands.h file that is non related to the
> multifunction device (in the sense that is not exporting any function of
> the mfd device). This causes crossed includes between mfd and
> platform/chrome subsystems and makes the code difficult to read, apart
> from creating 'curious' situations where a platform/chrome driver includes
> a linux/mfd/cros_ec.h file just to get the exported functions that are
> implemented in another platform/chrome driver.
> In order to have a better separation on what the cros-ec multifunction
> driver does and what the cros-ec core provides move and rework the
> affected includes doing:
> - Move cros_ec_commands.h to include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h
> - Get rid of the parts that are implemented in the platform/chrome/cros_ec_proto.c
> driver from include/linux/mfd/cros_ec.h to a new file
> include/linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
> - Update all the drivers with the new includes, so
> - Drivers that only need to know about the protocol include
> - linux/platform_data/cros_ec_proto.h
> - linux/platform_data/cros_ec_commands.h
> - Drivers that need to know about the cros-ec mfd device also include
> - linux/mfd/cros_ec.h
> Signed-off-by: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (for the I2C part)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature