Re: [PATCH v9 12/16] sched/core: uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller
From: Tejun Heo
Date: Wed Jun 05 2019 - 10:48:57 EST
On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:39:50PM +0100, Patrick Bellasi wrote:
> Which means we will enforce the effective values as:
> i.e. keep the child protection since smaller than parent
> i.e. keep parent limit since stricter than child
> Please shout if I got it wrong, otherwise I'll update v10 to
> implement the above logic.
Everything sounds good to me. Please note that cgroup interface files
actually use literal "max" for limit/protection max settings so that 0
and "max" mean the same things for all limit/protection knobs.