Re: [PATCH] MIPS: lb60: Fix pin mappings
From: Linus Walleij
Date: Sat Jun 08 2019 - 09:43:37 EST
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 12:14 PM Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Le sam. 8 juin 2019 Ã 0:10, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> a
> Ãcrit :
> > On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 6:34 PM Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >> The pin mappings introduced in commit 636f8ba67fb6
> >> ("MIPS: JZ4740: Qi LB60: Add pinctrl configuration for several
> >> drivers")
> >> are completely wrong. The pinctrl driver name is incorrect, and the
> >> function and group fields are swapped.
> >> Fixes: 636f8ba67fb6 ("MIPS: JZ4740: Qi LB60: Add pinctrl
> >> configuration for several drivers")
> >> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Cercueil <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Such things happen. Are you planning to phase all the board files over
> > to use devicetree eventually?
> Yes, that's definitely what's planned; right now the blockers are
> patchsets  and .  is ignored by everybody because there's no
> maintainer for drivers/memory/.  is a year-long effort that still
> doesn't show me the light at the end of the tunnel.
>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/4/743
>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/5/21/679
What? That's unacceptable, the last resort is usually to send the
patches to Andrew Morton (whether fair or not) when nothing gets
In this case I would however encourage the MIPS maintainer to
simply queue this stuff in the MIPS tree as blocking his arch work
if not merged, Ralf would you consider just queueing this?
I do not think the other Linus would mind.