Re: [PATCH 2/5] x86/vsyscall: Add a new vsyscall=xonly mode
From: Andy Lutomirski
Date: Thu Jun 13 2019 - 15:13:35 EST
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 1:43 PM Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 01:25:28PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > With vsyscall emulation on, we still expose a readable vsyscall page
> > that contains syscall instructions that validly implement the
> > vsyscalls. We need this because certain dynamic binary
> > instrumentation tools attempt to read the call targets of call
> > instructions in the instrumented code. If the instrumented code
> > uses vsyscalls, then the vsyscal page needs to contain readable
> > code.
> > Unfortunately, leaving readable memory at a deterministic address
> > can be used to help various ASLR bypasses, so we gain some hardening
> > value if we disallow vsyscall reads.
> > Given how rarely the vsyscall page needs to be readable, add a
> > mechanism to make the vsyscall page be execute only.
> Should the commit log mention that the VVAR portion goes away under
> xonly? (Since it's not executable.)
No, because vsyscall VVAR is long gone no matter what. Even the old
vsyscall=native didn't have it.