Re: 4.19: udpgso_bench_tx: setsockopt zerocopy: Unknown error 524

From: David Miller
Date: Tue Jun 18 2019 - 18:49:16 EST

From: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2019 14:58:26 -0400

> I see that in similar such cases that use the test harness
> (ksft_test_result_skip) the overall test returns success as long as
> all individual cases return either success or skip.
> I think it's preferable to return KSFT_SKIP if any of the cases did so
> (and none returned an error). I'll do that unless anyone objects.

I guess this is a question of semantics.

I mean, if you report skip at the top level does that mean that all
sub tests were skipped? People may think so... :)