Re: [PATCH 1/8] sched: introduce task_se_h_load helper
From: Rik van Riel
Date: Wed Jun 19 2019 - 12:00:26 EST
On Wed, 2019-06-19 at 17:18 +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> On 6/19/19 3:57 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > That would work, but task_h_load then dereferences
> > task->se to get the se->avg.load_avg value.
> > Going back to task from the se, only to then get the
> > se from the task seems a little unnecessary :)
> > Can you explain why you think task_h_load(task_of(se))
> > would be better? I think I may be overlooking something.
> Ah, OK, I just wanted to avoid having task_se_h_load() and
> at the same time. You could replace the remaining calls to
> task_h_load(p) with task_se_h_load(&p->se) in this case.
> - task_load = task_h_load(p);
> + task_load = task_se_h_load(&p->se);
> Not that important though right now ...
That I can do.
I might as well do that while going through the
rest of the series to merge in the bug fix that
I have for the performance regression, and the
fixes for compilation with other config options.
Thank you for the suggestion.
All Rights Reversed.
Description: This is a digitally signed message part