Re: [PATCH] mfd: da9063: occupy second I2C address, too

From: Wolfram Sang
Date: Thu Jun 20 2019 - 05:26:33 EST

> Is this a safety clause? What I mean is, shouldn't the hardware design make
> sure there are not two devices located on the same I2C bus with the same slave
> address?

It is more about preventing userspace to accidently access this address,
and thus the registers behind it.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature