Re: [PATCH] ACPI: PM: Export the function acpi_sleep_state_supported()
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Thu Jun 20 2019 - 07:36:28 EST
> > From: linux-hyperv-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > <linux-hyperv-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Lorenzo Pieralisi
> > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2019 9:15 AM
> > > ...
> > > + some ARM experts who worked on arch/arm/kernel/hibernate.c.
> > >
> > > drivers/acpi/sleep.c is only built if ACPI_SYSTEM_POWER_STATES_SUPPORT
> > > is defined, but it looks this option is not defined on ARM.
> > >
> > > It looks ARM does not support the ACPI S4 state, then how do we know
> > > if an ARM host supports hibernation or not?
> > Maybe we should start from understanding why you need to know whether
> > Hibernate is possible to answer your question ?
> > On ARM64 platforms system states are entered through PSCI firmware
> > interface that works for ACPI and device tree alike.
> > Lorenzo
> Hi Lorenzo,
> It looks I may have confused you as I didn't realize the word "ARM" only means
> 32-bit ARM. It looks the "ARM" arch and the "ARM64" arch are very different.
> As far as I know, Hyper-V only supports x86 and "ARM64", and it's unlikely to
> support 32-bit ARM in the future, so actually I don't really need to know if and
> how a 32-bit ARM machine supports hibernation.
> When a Linux guest runs on Hyper-V (x86_32, x86_64, or ARM64) , we have a
> front-end balloon driver in the guest, which balloons up/down and
> hot adds/removes the guest's memory when the host requests that. The problem
> is: the back-end driver on the host can not really save and restore the states
> related to the front-end balloon driver on guest hibernation, so we made the
> decision that balloon up/down and hot-add/remove are not supported when
> we enable hibernation for a guest; BTW, we still want to load the front-end
> driver in the guest, because the dirver has a functionality of reporting the
> guest's memory pressure to the host, which we think is useful.
> On x86_32 and x86_64, we enable hibernation for a guest by enabling
> the virtual ACPI S4 state for the guest; on ARM64, so far we don't have the
> host side changes required to support guest hibernation, so the details are
> still unclear.
> After I discussed with Michael Kelley, it looks we don't really need to
> export drivers/acpi/sleep.c: acpi_sleep_state_supported(), but I think we do
> need to make it non-static.
> Now I propose the below changes. I plan to submit a patch first for the
> changes made to drivers/acpi/sleep.c and include/acpi/acpi_bus.h in a few
> days, if there is no objection.
> Please let me know how you think of this. Thanks!
Hibernation should be always supported, no matter what firmware. If it
can powerdown, it can hibernate.
That is for x86-32/64, too.
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html