Re: [PATCH 1/3] timekeeping: add missing non-_ns functions for fast accessors

From: Jason A. Donenfeld
Date: Fri Jun 21 2019 - 10:33:23 EST

On Fri, Jun 21, 2019 at 4:29 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Typo: you have the same function names listed twice here,
> one of them should be ktime_get_mono_fast() instead of
> ktime_get_mono_fast_ns().

Nice catch. Vim twitches gone crazy.

> Also, we might want to rename ktime_get_boot_fast_ns()
> to ktime_get_boottime_fast_ns in the process. It seems there
> is only a single caller.

And tai -> clocktai on the others. I can send a followup patch to
unify all those after this set.