Re: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of IS_ENABLED macro
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Date: Mon Jun 24 2019 - 05:00:58 EST
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:53 AM Daniel Lezcano
> Hi Viresh,
> On 21/06/2019 15:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > The functions stub already exist for the condition the IS_ENABLED
> > is trying to avoid.
> > Remove the IS_ENABLED macros as they are pointless.
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
> what about this one?
Care to respond to my question regarding this one in the first place, please?