Re: [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of IS_ENABLED macro
From: Daniel Lezcano
Date: Mon Jun 24 2019 - 05:08:00 EST
On 24/06/2019 11:00, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:53 AM Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Viresh,
>> On 21/06/2019 15:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> The functions stub already exist for the condition the IS_ENABLED
>>> is trying to avoid.
>>> Remove the IS_ENABLED macros as they are pointless.
>>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> what about this one?
> Care to respond to my question regarding this one in the first place, please?
Ah yes, sorry, I missed your email.
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |