[PATCH 07/10] platform/x86: ISST: Add Intel Speed Select mailbox interface via MSRs

From: Srinivas Pandruvada
Date: Wed Jun 26 2019 - 18:39:18 EST


Add an IOCTL to send mailbox commands to PUNIT using PUNIT MSRs for
mailbox. Some CPU models don't have PCI device, so need to use MSRs.
A limited set of mailbox commands can be sent to PUNIT.

This MMIO interface is used by the intel-speed-select tool under
tools/x86/power to enumerate and control Intel Speed Select features.
The MBOX commands ids and semantics of the message can be checked from
the source code of the tool.

Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../x86/intel_speed_select_if/Makefile | 1 +
.../intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mbox_msr.c | 180 ++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 181 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mbox_msr.c

diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/Makefile
index 8dec8c858649..856076206f35 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/Makefile
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SPEED_SELECT_INTERFACE) += isst_if_common.o
obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SPEED_SELECT_INTERFACE) += isst_if_mmio.o
obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SPEED_SELECT_INTERFACE) += isst_if_mbox_pci.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_SPEED_SELECT_INTERFACE) += isst_if_mbox_msr.o
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mbox_msr.c b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mbox_msr.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a949ec436c73
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/intel_speed_select_if/isst_if_mbox_msr.c
@@ -0,0 +1,180 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Intel Speed Select Interface: Mbox via MSR Interface
+ * Copyright (c) 2019, Intel Corporation.
+ * All rights reserved.
+ *
+ * Author: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/cpuhotplug.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
+#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+#include <linux/topology.h>
+#include <linux/uaccess.h>
+#include <uapi/linux/isst_if.h>
+#include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
+#include <asm/intel-family.h>
+
+#include "isst_if_common.h"
+
+#define MSR_OS_MAILBOX_INTERFACE 0xB0
+#define MSR_OS_MAILBOX_DATA 0xB1
+#define MSR_OS_MAILBOX_BUSY_BIT 31
+
+/*
+ * Based on experiments count is never more than 1, as the MSR overhead
+ * is enough to finish the command. So here this is the worst case number.
+ */
+#define OS_MAILBOX_RETRY_COUNT 3
+
+static int isst_if_send_mbox_cmd(u8 command, u8 sub_command, u32 parameter,
+ u32 command_data, u32 *response_data)
+{
+ u32 retries;
+ u64 data;
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Poll for rb bit == 0 */
+ retries = OS_MAILBOX_RETRY_COUNT;
+ do {
+ rdmsrl(MSR_OS_MAILBOX_INTERFACE, data);
+ if (data & BIT_ULL(MSR_OS_MAILBOX_BUSY_BIT)) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ continue;
+ }
+ ret = 0;
+ break;
+ } while (--retries);
+
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* Write DATA register */
+ wrmsrl(MSR_OS_MAILBOX_DATA, command_data);
+
+ /* Write command register */
+ data = BIT_ULL(MSR_OS_MAILBOX_BUSY_BIT) |
+ (parameter & GENMASK_ULL(13, 0)) << 16 |
+ (sub_command << 8) |
+ command;
+ wrmsrl(MSR_OS_MAILBOX_INTERFACE, data);
+
+ /* Poll for rb bit == 0 */
+ retries = OS_MAILBOX_RETRY_COUNT;
+ do {
+ rdmsrl(MSR_OS_MAILBOX_INTERFACE, data);
+ if (data & BIT_ULL(MSR_OS_MAILBOX_BUSY_BIT)) {
+ ret = -EBUSY;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (data & 0xff)
+ return -ENXIO;
+
+ if (response_data) {
+ rdmsrl(MSR_OS_MAILBOX_DATA, data);
+ *response_data = data;
+ }
+ ret = 0;
+ break;
+ } while (--retries);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+struct msrl_action {
+ int err;
+ struct isst_if_mbox_cmd *mbox_cmd;
+};
+
+/* revisit, smp_call_function_single should be enough for atomic mailbox! */
+static void msrl_update_func(void *info)
+{
+ struct msrl_action *act = info;
+
+ act->err = isst_if_send_mbox_cmd(act->mbox_cmd->command,
+ act->mbox_cmd->sub_command,
+ act->mbox_cmd->parameter,
+ act->mbox_cmd->req_data,
+ &act->mbox_cmd->resp_data);
+}
+
+static long isst_if_mbox_proc_cmd(u8 *cmd_ptr, int *write_only, int resume)
+{
+ struct msrl_action action;
+ int ret;
+
+ action.mbox_cmd = (struct isst_if_mbox_cmd *)cmd_ptr;
+
+ if (isst_if_mbox_cmd_invalid(action.mbox_cmd))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (isst_if_mbox_cmd_set_req(action.mbox_cmd) &&
+ !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ /*
+ * To complete mailbox command, we need to access two MSRs.
+ * So we don't want race to complete a mailbox transcation.
+ * Here smp_call ensures that msrl_update_func() has no race
+ * and also with wait flag, wait for completion.
+ * smp_call_function_single is using get_cpu() and put_cpu().
+ */
+ ret = smp_call_function_single(action.mbox_cmd->logical_cpu,
+ msrl_update_func, &action, 1);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ *write_only = 0;
+
+ return action.err;
+}
+
+#define ICPU(model) { X86_VENDOR_INTEL, 6, model, X86_FEATURE_ANY, }
+
+static const struct x86_cpu_id isst_if_cpu_ids[] = {
+ ICPU(INTEL_FAM6_SKYLAKE_X),
+ {}
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(x86cpu, isst_if_cpu_ids);
+
+static int __init isst_if_mbox_init(void)
+{
+ struct isst_if_cmd_cb cb;
+ const struct x86_cpu_id *id;
+ u64 data;
+ int ret;
+
+ id = x86_match_cpu(isst_if_cpu_ids);
+ if (!id)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ /* Check presence of mailbox MSRs */
+ ret = rdmsrl_safe(MSR_OS_MAILBOX_INTERFACE, &data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = rdmsrl_safe(MSR_OS_MAILBOX_DATA, &data);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ memset(&cb, 0, sizeof(cb));
+ cb.cmd_size = sizeof(struct isst_if_mbox_cmd);
+ cb.offset = offsetof(struct isst_if_mbox_cmds, mbox_cmd);
+ cb.cmd_callback = isst_if_mbox_proc_cmd;
+ cb.owner = THIS_MODULE;
+ return isst_if_cdev_register(ISST_IF_DEV_MBOX, &cb);
+}
+module_init(isst_if_mbox_init)
+
+static void __exit isst_if_mbox_exit(void)
+{
+ isst_if_cdev_unregister(ISST_IF_DEV_MBOX);
+}
+module_exit(isst_if_mbox_exit)
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel speed select interface mailbox driver");
--
2.17.2