Re: linux-next: Tree for Jun 26 (security/integrity/ima/)

From: David Howells
Date: Thu Jun 27 2019 - 09:29:15 EST

Mimi Zohar <zohar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> > CC security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.o
> > In file included from ../security/integrity/ima/ima.h:25:0,
> > from ../security/integrity/ima/ima_fs.c:26:
> > ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: âstruct key_aclâ declared inside parameter list [enabled by default]
> > struct key_acl *acl)
> > ^
> > ../security/integrity/ima/../integrity.h:170:18: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want [enabled by default]
> David, CONFIG_INTEGRITY_SIGNATURE is dependent on KEYS being enabled,
> but the stub functions are not. ÂThere's now a dependency on
> key_acl().

I added a forward declaration for struct key_acl into
security/integrity/integrity.h as you can see here:

which might not have made it into linux-next before you used it.