Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] vsock/virtio: several fixes in the .probe() and .remove()

From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Date: Mon Jul 01 2019 - 11:11:19 EST


On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 02:36:56PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> During the review of "[PATCH] vsock/virtio: Initialize core virtio vsock
> before registering the driver", Stefan pointed out some possible issues
> in the .probe() and .remove() callbacks of the virtio-vsock driver.
>
> This series tries to solve these issues:
> - Patch 1 adds RCU critical sections to avoid use-after-free of
> 'the_virtio_vsock' pointer.
> - Patch 2 stops workers before to call vdev->config->reset(vdev) to
> be sure that no one is accessing the device.
> - Patch 3 moves the works flush at the end of the .remove() to avoid
> use-after-free of 'vsock' object.
>
> v2:
> - Patch 1: use RCU to protect 'the_virtio_vsock' pointer
> - Patch 2: no changes
> - Patch 3: flush works only at the end of .remove()
> - Removed patch 4 because virtqueue_detach_unused_buf() returns all the buffers
> allocated.
>
> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/cover/10964733/

This looks good to me.

Did you run any stress tests? For example an SMP guest constantly
connecting and sending packets together with a script that
hotplug/unplugs vhost-vsock-pci from the host side.

Stefan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature