[PATCH] kvm: x86: some tsc debug cleanup

[Yi Wang]

There are some pr_debug in TSC code, which may have
been no use, so remove them as Paolo suggested.

Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 --------
 1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index fafd81d..86f9861 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1518,9 +1518,6 @@ static void kvm_get_time_scale(uint64_t scaled_hz, uint64_t base_hz,
 
 	*pshift = shift;
 	*pmultiplier = div_frac(scaled64, tps32);
-
-	pr_debug("%s: base_hz %llu => %llu, shift %d, mul %u\n",
-		 __func__, base_hz, scaled_hz, shift, *pmultiplier);
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
@@ -1763,12 +1760,10 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
 	    vcpu->arch.virtual_tsc_khz == kvm->arch.last_tsc_khz) {
 		if (!kvm_check_tsc_unstable()) {
 			offset = kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset;
-			pr_debug("kvm: matched tsc offset for %llu\n", data);
 		} else {
 			u64 delta = nsec_to_cycles(vcpu, elapsed);
 			data += delta;
 			offset = kvm_compute_tsc_offset(vcpu, data);
-			pr_debug("kvm: adjusted tsc offset by %llu\n", delta);
 		}
 		matched = true;
 		already_matched = (vcpu->arch.this_tsc_generation == kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation);
@@ -1787,8 +1782,6 @@ void kvm_write_tsc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr)
 		kvm->arch.cur_tsc_write = data;
 		kvm->arch.cur_tsc_offset = offset;
 		matched = false;
-		pr_debug("kvm: new tsc generation %llu, clock %llu\n",
-			 kvm->arch.cur_tsc_generation, data);
 	}
 
 	/*
@@ -6857,7 +6850,6 @@ static void kvm_timer_init(void)
 		cpufreq_register_notifier(&kvmclock_cpufreq_notifier_block,
 					  CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
 	}
-	pr_debug("kvm: max_tsc_khz = %ld\n", max_tsc_khz);
 
 	cpuhp_setup_state(CPUHP_AP_X86_KVM_CLK_ONLINE, "x86/kvm/clk:online",
 			  kvmclock_cpu_online, kvmclock_cpu_down_prep);
-- 
1.8.3.1