Re: [PATCH] sched/topology: One function call less in build_group_from_child_sched_domain()

From: Srikar Dronamraju
Date: Sat Jul 06 2019 - 13:22:34 EST


* Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@xxxxxx> [2019-07-06 16:05:17]:

> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2019 16:00:13 +0200
>
> Avoid an extra function call by using a ternary operator instead of
> a conditional statement.
>
> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> kernel/sched/topology.c | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> index f751ce0b783e..6190eb52c30a 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
> @@ -886,11 +886,7 @@ build_group_from_child_sched_domain(struct sched_domain *sd, int cpu)
> return NULL;
>
> sg_span = sched_group_span(sg);
> - if (sd->child)
> - cpumask_copy(sg_span, sched_domain_span(sd->child));
> - else
> - cpumask_copy(sg_span, sched_domain_span(sd));
> -
> + cpumask_copy(sg_span, sched_domain_span(sd->child ? sd->child : sd));

At runtime, Are we avoiding a function call?
However I think we are avoiding a branch instead of a conditional, which may
be beneficial.

> atomic_inc(&sg->ref);
> return sg;
> }
> --
> 2.22.0
>

--
Thanks and Regards
Srikar Dronamraju