Re: Re: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] rtc: mt6397: improvements of rtc driver
From: Alexandre Belloni
Date: Sat Jul 06 2019 - 16:11:56 EST
On 06/07/2019 18:15:20+0200, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > Gesendet: Freitag, 05. Juli 2019 um 23:24 Uhr
> > Von: "Alexandre Belloni" <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Let's say the RTC has been used to start your platform, then the irq
> > handler will be called as soon as the irq is requested, leading to a
> > null pointer dereference.
> i cannot test this with my platform, but i have changed it in my repo
> > Yes and IIRC, I did comment that the rtc change also had to be separated
> > from 1/7.
> also this is put in separate commit, can you take a look before i post v3?
> > Also, I really doubt this new compatible is necessary at all as you
> > could simply directly use mediatek,mt6397-rtc.
> imho this can confuse because the wrong chip-name is used in dts
This is not true, we do that all the time and the immediate benefit of
using the mt6397 compatible is that then there is no need to
synchronize between subsystems. If you want to be absolutely
conservative, you could use
compatible = "mediatek,mt6323-rtc", "mediatek,mt6397-rtc";
in your DT.
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering