Re: [PATCH 0/3] Update pcengines-apuv2 platform device
From: Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Date: Mon Jul 08 2019 - 15:39:47 EST
On 05.07.19 13:36, Florian Eckert wrote:
> APU1 (PC-Engines) CPU "AMD G series T40E APU":> This is also an old design and is not recommend for new design>
(deprecated).> Also not many were produced and are in the field.> See
Yes, and I haven't been able to get one yet, so I dropped my original
plan of supporting this once. The gpio device is very different.
> Platform-Device (LEDs, Button):> I have no platform device description found in the linux sources.> So
the GPIO button should not work.
Talking about the old driver ? It only supports the three front LEDs
directly and conflicts w/ anything else that wants to support other
> Platform-Device (LEDs, Button):
> This Platform description is only valid for APU2/APU3 and not for APU1.
Correct. If we really wanna support APUv1, that most likely become a
completely separate driver, as the chipsets are very different.
> We have an additional device only for LEDs this works for APU1/APU2/APU3.
> I think we should remove the APU2/APU3 LEDs from the leds-apu device as
> mentioned above.
> So this device supports only the APU1 LEDs.
> We could extend and/or rename the pcengienes-apuv2 device to support
> also APU3 and the newest APU4.
APUv3 already is supported. APUv4 again is pretty different, and I don't
have one yet. (if anybody convices pcengines to give me some boards,
I'll add support for them :))
> The APU3 does have an additional the simswap pin.
Already planned to add it, but not yet sorted into which subsystem it
actually belongs to.
> We should change this to the following layout and add the legacy GPIO
First we'll have to sort out where the new pins actually belong into.
(maybe power management / regulators for the reset pins ?)
> ALIX (PC-Engines) CPU "AMD Geode LX":
> This is an old design we have already in use and is not recommend for
> new design (deprecated)
And it's an entirely different chipset, not related at all to apu.
> I think we should leave the driver as it is because this is a different
> design and has nothing to do with the PUs.
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult
Free software and Linux embedded engineering
info@xxxxxxxxx -- +49-151-27565287