Re: [PATCH 04/12] iio: adc: max9611: Fix misuse of GENMASK macro

[Joe Perches]

On Sun, 2019-07-14 at 12:54 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue,  9 Jul 2019 22:04:17 -0700
> Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Arguments are supposed to be ordered high then low.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Applied to the fixes-togreg branch of iio.git and marked for
> stable etc.

This mask is used in an init function called from a probe.

I don't have this hardware but it looks as if it could
never have worked so I doubt the driver and the hardware
have ever been tested.

Does anyone have this device in actual use?


	regval = ret & MAX9611_TEMP_MASK;

	if ((regval > MAX9611_TEMP_MAX_POS &&
	     regval < MAX9611_TEMP_MIN_NEG) ||
	     regval > MAX9611_TEMP_MAX_NEG) {
		dev_err(max9611->dev,
			"Invalid value received from ADC 0x%4x: aborting\n",
			regval);
		return -EIO;
	}


> Thanks,
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/iio/adc/max9611.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/max9611.c b/drivers/iio/adc/max9611.c
> > index 917223d5ff5b..0e3c6529fc4c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iio/adc/max9611.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/max9611.c
> > @@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
> >  #define MAX9611_TEMP_MAX_POS		0x7f80
> >  #define MAX9611_TEMP_MAX_NEG		0xff80
> >  #define MAX9611_TEMP_MIN_NEG		0xd980
> > -#define MAX9611_TEMP_MASK		GENMASK(7, 15)
> > +#define MAX9611_TEMP_MASK		GENMASK(15, 7)
> >  #define MAX9611_TEMP_SHIFT		0x07
> >  #define MAX9611_TEMP_RAW(_r)		((_r) >> MAX9611_TEMP_SHIFT)
> >  #define MAX9611_TEMP_SCALE_NUM		1000000