Re: [PATCH] padata: use smp_mb in padata_reorder to avoid orphaned padata jobs

[Daniel Jordan]

On 7/16/19 11:01 AM, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 02:53:09PM +0200, Andrea Parri wrote:
> > P1(atomic_t *reorder_objects, spinlock_t *pd_lock, spinlock_t *reorder_lock)
> > {
> > 	int r1;
> >
> > 	spin_lock(reorder_lock);
> > 	atomic_inc(reorder_objects);
> > 	spin_unlock(reorder_lock);
> > 	//smp_mb();
> > 	r1 = spin_trylock(pd_lock);
> > }
>
> Yes we need a matching mb on the other side.  However, we can
> get away with using smp_mb__after_atomic thanks to the atomic_inc
> above.
>
> Daniel, can you please respin the patch with the matching smp_mb?

Sure, Herbert, will do.

Thanks,
Daniel