Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] dt-bindings: opp: Introduce opp-peak-KBps and opp-avg-KBps bindings

From: Rob Herring
Date: Mon Jul 22 2019 - 19:35:06 EST

On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 11:58:08AM -0700, Saravana Kannan wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:25 AM Sibi Sankar <sibis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hey Saravana,
> >
> >
> > There was already a discussion ^^ on how bandwidth bindings were to be
> > named.
> Yes, I'm aware of that series. That series is trying to define a BW
> mapping for an existing frequency OPP table. This patch is NOT about
> adding a mapping to an existing table. This patch is about adding the
> notion of BW OPP tables where BW is the "key" instead of "frequency".
> So let's not mixed up these two series.

Maybe different reasons, but in the end we'd end up with 2 bandwidth
properties. We need to sort out how they'd overlap/coexist.

The same comment in that series about defining a standard unit suffix
also applies to this one.