Re: [PATCH v12 1/5] can: m_can: Create a m_can platform framework

[Dan Murphy]

Hello

On 7/10/19 7:08 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> Hello
>
> On 6/17/19 10:09 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > Marc
> >
> > On 6/10/19 11:35 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > Bump
> > >
> > > On 6/6/19 8:16 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > Marc
> > > >
> > > > Bump
> > > >
> > > > On 5/31/19 6:51 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > > Marc
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/15/19 3:54 PM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > > > Marc
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 5/9/19 11:11 AM, Dan Murphy wrote:
> > > > > > > Create a m_can platform framework that peripheral
> > > > > > > devices can register to and use common code and register sets.
> > > > > > > The peripheral devices may provide read/write and configuration
> > > > > > > support of the IP.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dan Murphy <dmurphy@xxxxxx>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > v12 - Update the m_can_read/write functions to create a 
> > > > > > > backtrace if the callback
> > > > > > > pointer is NULL. - https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1052302/
> > > > > > Is this able to be merged now?
> > > > >
> > > > > ping
> >
> > Wondering if there is anything else we need to do?
> >
> > The part has officially shipped and we had hoped to have driver 
> > support in Linux as part of the announcement.
> Is this being sent in a PR for 5.3?
>
> Dan
Adding Greg to this thread as I have no idea what is going on with 
this. This patch set has missed 2 merge windows and has

been ready since May. Our customers are requesting status but we can 
only point to the mail thread

Here is the reference of the pinging I have done without reply

https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1071894/

Dan


> > Dan
> >
> >
> > > > > > Dan
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <snip>