Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: net: phy: Add subnode for LED configuration

From: Andrew Lunn
Date: Fri Aug 02 2019 - 12:58:03 EST


On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 12:07:56PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> The LED behavior of some Ethernet PHYs is configurable. Add an
> optional 'leds' subnode with a child node for each LED to be
> configured. The binding aims to be compatible with the common
> LED binding (see devicetree/bindings/leds/common.txt).
>
> A LED can be configured to be 'on' when a link with a certain speed
> is active, or to blink on RX/TX activity. For the configuration to
> be effective it needs to be supported by the hardware and the
> corresponding PHY driver.
>
> Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Changes in v4:
> - patch added to the series
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml | 47 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> index f70f18ff821f..81c5aacc89a5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ethernet-phy.yaml
> @@ -153,6 +153,38 @@ properties:
> Delay after the reset was deasserted in microseconds. If
> this property is missing the delay will be skipped.
>
> +patternProperties:
> + "^leds$":
> + type: object
> + description:
> + Subnode with configuration of the PHY LEDs.
> +
> + patternProperties:
> + "^led@[0-9]+$":
> + type: object
> + description:
> + Subnode with the configuration of a single PHY LED.
> +
> + properties:
> + reg:
> + description:
> + The ID number of the LED, typically corresponds to a hardware ID.
> + $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32"
> +
> + linux,default-trigger:
> + description:
> + This parameter, if present, is a string specifying the trigger
> + assigned to the LED. Supported triggers are:
> + "phy_link_10m_active" - LED will be on when a 10Mb/s link is active
> + "phy_link_100m_active" - LED will be on when a 100Mb/s link is active
> + "phy_link_1g_active" - LED will be on when a 1Gb/s link is active
> + "phy_link_10g_active" - LED will be on when a 10Gb/s link is active
> + "phy_activity" - LED will blink when data is received or transmitted

Matthias

We should think a bit more about these names.

I can see in future needing 1G link, but it blinks off when there is
active traffic? So phy_link_1g_active could be confusing, and very similar to
phy_link_1g_activity? So maybe

> + "phy_link_10m" - LED will be solid on when a 10Mb/s link is active
> + "phy_link_100m" - LED will be solid on when a 100Mb/s link is active
> + "phy_link_1g" - LED will be solid on when a 1Gb/s link is active

etc.

And then in the future we can have

"phy_link_1g_activity' - LED will be on when 1Gbp/s
link is active and blink off
with activity.

What other use cases do we have? I don't want to support everything,
but we should be able to represent the most common modes without the
names getting too confusing.

Andrew